Kids don’t seem to have much trouble learning the Dabbing unicorn too cute to be straight LGBT shirt Apart from…,I will love this rigor that is part of being on a high school football team. Rigor is not automatically something that children feel they need to avoid. Rigor is something to be avoided when it is felt as something that is likely to prove that you are a loser. If play is put in one category and learning in the opposite, then who should be surprised to discover that learning, and then work, is associated with something unpleasant you do, after which you reward yourself with fun? Very quickly, as learning becomes associated with unpleasantness that needs to be endured, curiosity becomes collateral damage. Your living strategy then becomes, minimize the learning or work and maximize the fun. The minute the teacher’s head is turned, or the supervisor’s head is turned, you switch to the computer game. This is something that isn’t boring. This is something that is fun. You are taking back the fun that life has stolen from you. Often ‘A’ students are the children who have conditioned themselves to be inured to tedium. Also, often ‘F’ students are only those students who can’t stand being bored. Obviously, both kinds of kids are at risk in terms of personal fulfillment. I don’t accept the idea that schooling and education are the same thing. What many people consider a good school might actually be a toxic educational environment, even if the average student in this school achieves comparatively good grades on those dreadful multiple choice, bubble in, high stakes exams. I would tend to make sure that my child isn’t placed in a toxic educational environment, whether the school advertises a rigorous curriculum or not. I have visited too many incurious and mediocre physicians who, no doubt, earned ‘A’s in medical school, to be convinced otherwise. For those who don’t know, government-schools in India represent the poverty-stricken sections, in the cities as well as in the rural areas, although obviously the condition is much worse in the latter. Not only are these schools in a state that varies from poor to horrifically dilapidated, the kids who study here mostly come from the slums. These schools, these children, their homes, their families, their backgrounds for a rough idea of the picture think: Slumdog Millionaire. The point is, it is the really poor people that I am going to talk about. Including those who lie below the poverty line. You are completely right about the relation between poverty and overpopulation.
Dabbing unicorn too cute to be straight LGBT shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt
It is cyclic, hence a doubly serious concern globally. Let me cut to the Dabbing unicorn too cute to be straight LGBT shirt Apart from…,I will love this chase with the reasons on why poor people produce more children than they can afford to raise. I will try not to be country-specific, but most points may seem more relevant to developing countries, particularly India. They saw this in the previous generations, were taught so in the way they were raised, and thus it slowly got wired into their brains. Women must produce babies. It is their job, it is why they are given the favor of being brought into another family and fed. A “barren” woman would be immediately discarded and rejected even by a family that has no resources to raise a baby whatsoever. Somebody must keep the family name alive. More babies means more children to ensure the same. Again a traditional attitude. They never tried to ask why is this more important than improving their own condition, why is it important at all. They never tried to understand the (lack of) logic behind it. What would their descendants do? Conquer the world? Run a family business? Make their name immortal? No. They would just make sure that they produce more generations of poorer, unhealthier, more unfortunate people. But no, the surname must live on. This is crucial in the entire scheme of things. For most poor people, a girl-child is still something to be ashamed of. If they don’t kill her, they will use her as a domestic servant they have to marry off some years later, or in the worst cases, sell her off. But it wouldn’t stop there. They would again try for a child, until they get a son. Sad, but true. The desire is usually for a boy, of course. He can do hard labor, he can help the father in his little work, he can go around without the family being scared for his safety, he can protect the family a little more. If it’s a girl child, she could help the mother in the kitchen and in household chores. Some of the more open-minded parents do believe in educating their children well so that they build for themselves a better life. But a lot of them, especially those who do not want their child to study, still think this way. She is a wife, a daughter-in-law, and a baby-producing machine. And that’s it. There is no concern for her health and what producing too many children does to her body. She has no say in this. Even if she dies, she can be replaced.